 |
| [OcUK]diogenese 2010-02-17 23:58:28 | Linac900Removable3 has reappeared on my latticelist and on the results page, is that supposed to happen or has it gone odd again like it did the other day? |
| Stephen Brooks 2010-02-18 01:50:25 | It's supposed to be like this because [TN]opyrt and friends think they've found a result that's on a different path and beats the previous best. |
| [TN]opyrt 2010-02-18 08:41:35 | We just tested what Tomaz posted in some thread somewhere (that a run ending with a higher Mpts has a bigger chance of ending up with a higher muon % if optimized properly).  BTW: "and friends" is [TN]Steinrar. |
| yoyo 2010-02-18 17:51:00 | I run a similar optimizations since weeks now for the Boinc user. I put 100 results with the highest Mpts and Stephens samplefile together as samplefile for the Boinc user. yoyo |
| [TN]opyrt 2010-02-18 20:35:16 | We've done it a little bit different. We've been focusing on really small samplefiles (1-4 results) with results with high Mpts where there were no results with equal or higher Mpts among the high muon% results. Then we let them run for a few days to see if we made any progress. Then we'd rebuild our samplefiles from the most interresting results (but keeping our result.dat files as we progressed towards higher muon%). If anyone is interrested, let me know, and I'll explain in more detail. |
| [TN]opyrt 2010-02-19 19:30:00 | [TA]Silverthorne found an optimization above 3% now! Brilliant! |
| [TA]Assimilator1 2010-03-13 09:29:49 | Seems to of near enough flatelined since. |
| Stephen Brooks 2010-04-21 15:06:14 | I've removed it again now. |
