[DPC]Stephan202 2004-08-05 10:30:18 | Currently DPC is the number two team when it comes to contributed work calculated in Mpts: http://muon.qik.nl/ The above stats are generated using simplestats.txt On the project site however DPC is said to be the number 4 team on both stats pages: http://www.stephenbrooks.org/muon1/#stats http://www.stephenbrooks.org/muon1/v5.html?hide=1&teams=1 This is because the points of users inactive over 1000 hours are not calculated. (Also the scores on these two sites differ; why?) Within DPC we believe that the 1000 hour rule is a little silly. Work done in the past is just as important as work currently done. Now we can flush a single small result on behalf of each of our inactive team members, but we'd rather just have this 1000 hour rule removed. What do Stephen and other users think about this? |
Q 2004-08-05 22:02:06 | I think its especially stupid for the team totals! |
Stephen Brooks 2004-08-06 00:56:55 | On reflection, I think it might be better if I replaced that "rule" by a simple filter so that people could choose themselves whether the stats rankings display very old accounts. I put it in originally mainly just so that the linear rankings (going down to 400 or so) didn't get cluttered by the old accounts that you just have to wade through. |
[DPC]Stephan202 2004-08-06 02:11:10 | Thanks. That would be great. Then I have just one question regarding this left: why do the team totals on your two stats pages differ? |
SuperHiddo 2004-08-06 02:18:54 | Nice reflection Stephen Stephan202: Maybe the difference is related to the 'error' in simplestats.txt compared to the rawstats? http://stephenbrooks.org/groupee/forums?a=tpc&s=724606111&f=3126012111&m=248100595 |