![]() |
FoBoT 2002-10-02 14:30:45 | what is the correct way to do this?? i opened results.dat with notepad and copy/pasted from the 250 file and 1000 file onto the end of it, but i don't know if that is right it doesn't seem to be doing anything different after i tried that Use the right tool for the right job! |
John Kitchen 2002-10-02 17:28:53 | That is exactly what I did, and the results were changed dramatically. Now I am running very close to 3%, up from way below 1%. Takes longer, but more useful. You will still see low numbers sometimes. If you do not see higher results after a few cycles, check the paste to see if it looks odd. John |
FoBoT 2002-10-02 18:04:59 | thanks, i will give it a while i just wanted to make sure there wasn't something that could foul it up, like having too many returns or spaces or something between the original stuff and the stuff i added it does seem to be taking quite a bit longer on this run Use the right tool for the right job! |
John Kitchen 2002-10-02 18:21:43 | ![]() |
wirthi [Free-DC] 2002-10-06 02:31:07 | Fobot, also note that you get more "stats-points" for results with better scores. AFAIK you get (particles retained)*15 stats points for results with a score of 3.0; the factor increases/decreases with the score of the result. (So you get similar stats-points for similar computation time) |
HETTATLONGUN 2002-10-06 06:15:36 | If you are running a dualy box, use the command line version, with the Config.txt file set to Tracks: 2. The simulations run faster and use both processors. If you are going to use the best 250 or best 1000, use either one. It isn't necessary to have both. I use the best 250. ![]() Ahh, morning....Nothing like a good cigar, a cup of coffee and the sound of hot shell casings hitting the deck....HETT[TEP] |
Stephen Brooks 2002-10-06 11:46:22 | quote: The dual-thread feature works on the Graphics and Background versions as well. On the 2x1.4GHz AMD at work you could really see those pions whizzing along ![]() |