stephenbrooks.orgForumMuon1GeneralPuzzled about awarded credit
Username: Password:
Search site:
Subscribe to thread via RSS
Fozzie
2006-03-28 10:42:25
Yesterday I uploaded some of my boxen I left running whilst I was away.  According to muon cockpit I should have got something around 2.2 million, only 1.7 showed up.

Today it said just over 2 million and I see only 1.5.

Did somthing happen whilst I was away, I'm sure they are running the 2 DecayRots and Chicane and one Phaserot as per the latest lattices.
Merlin
2006-03-28 14:21:31
Yes I noticed that too...

According to MounCockpit Monday, I should have had about 200,000 to 230,000 but only 1/2 showed

I was just going to check to see if they all uploaded to see if the .bin was there.....
Stephen Brooks
2006-03-29 02:11:10
Hopefully you know that you shouldn't count samplefile points in these totals (I don't know if muon cockpit eliminates these or not).

The other possibility is that some have got stuck on an FTP server.  I have logs of recent results received - for instance [US-Distributed]Merlin's account on DecayRot is here:
2006-Feb-22 07:55:39 Added 49/3352.6/0.401637 Rejected 21+0/1196.8/0.387092 BMark 73/4390.7/0.364466 to 122/7743.3/0.401637
2006-Feb-22 22:23:17 Added 58/2754.2/0.398470 Rejected 11+0/771.7/0.394421 BMark 122/7743.3/0.401637 to 180/10497.5/0.401637
2006-Feb-22 23:14:10 Added 22/1103.1/0.389552 BMark 180/10497.5/0.401637 to 202/11600.6/0.401637
2006-Feb-26 22:23:22 Added 257/14046.5/0.459969 Rejected 14+0/543.4/0.369070 BMark 202/11600.6/0.401637 to 459/25647.1/0.459969
2006-Feb-28 00:15:55 Added 87/4729.3/0.463362 BMark 459/25647.1/0.459969 to 546/30376.4/0.463362
2006-Feb-28 01:13:32 Added 21/1164.1/0.463362 Rejected 46+0/2919.8/0.463362 BMark 546/30376.4/0.463362 to 567/31540.5/0.463362
2006-Feb-28 10:30:49 Added 28/1589.7/0.458111 Rejected 6+0/317.7/0.432566 BMark 567/31540.5/0.463362 to 595/33130.2/0.463362
2006-Feb-28 23:18:35 Added 30/1445.5/0.438892 Rejected 4+0/170.7/0.422074 BMark 595/33130.2/0.463362 to 625/34575.7/0.463362
2006-Mar-01 23:25:46 Added 69/4033.3/0.458814 BMark 625/34575.7/0.463362 to 694/38609.0/0.463362
2006-Mar-03 00:20:59 Added 83/5131.3/0.467149 Rejected 16+0/966.8/0.454985 BMark 694/38609.0/0.463362 to 777/43740.3/0.467149
2006-Mar-05 12:13:37 Added 122/7192.3/0.466855 BMark 777/43740.3/0.467149 to 899/50932.6/0.467149
2006-Mar-05 20:48:50 Added 155/10221.5/0.651611 Rejected 40+0/2533.0/0.621114 BMark 899/50932.6/0.467149 to 1054/61154.1/0.651611
2006-Mar-09 00:32:40 Added 566/39131.0/0.672244 Rejected 55+0/3374.9/0.664331 BMark 1054/61154.1/0.651611 to 1620/100285.1/0.672244
2006-Mar-09 23:24:34 Added 180/12549.4/0.668083 Rejected 45+0/3187.0/0.663667 BMark 1620/100285.1/0.672244 to 1800/112834.5/0.672244
2006-Mar-13 15:03:37 Added 2340/149880.9/0.679861 Rejected 57+0/3933.0/0.649558 BMark 0/0.0/-8999999999999990000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.000000 to 2340/149880.9/0.679861
2006-Mar-13 23:15:28 Added 293/18621.0/0.790528 Rejected 73+0/5631.2/0.790528 BMark 2340/149880.9/0.679861 to 2633/168501.9/0.790528
2006-Mar-14 00:13:45 Added 28/1550.1/0.780805 BMark 2633/168501.9/0.790528 to 2661/170052.0/0.790528
2006-Mar-14 23:13:56 Added 289/19798.3/0.790482 Rejected 39+0/2448.7/0.784967 BMark 2661/170052.0/0.790528 to 2950/189850.3/0.790528
2006-Mar-15 00:14:07 Added 27/1623.8/0.790861 BMark 2950/189850.3/0.790528 to 2977/191474.1/0.790861
2006-Mar-16 13:59:09 Added 201/14610.0/0.813700 Rejected 23+0/1412.5/0.797713 BMark 2977/191474.1/0.790861 to 3178/206084.1/0.813700
2006-Mar-17 03:20:09 Added 224/18219.7/0.826841 BMark 3178/206084.1/0.813700 to 3402/224303.8/0.826841
2006-Mar-17 05:22:19 Added 14/1083.4/0.808927 BMark 3402/224303.8/0.826841 to 3416/225387.2/0.826841
2006-Mar-17 13:33:12 Added 18/1098.4/0.742623 BMark 3416/225387.2/0.826841 to 3434/226485.6/0.826841
2006-Mar-18 01:33:38 Added 328/26535.8/0.844105 Rejected 54+0/4148.4/0.837254 BMark 3434/226485.6/0.826841 to 3762/253021.4/0.844105
2006-Mar-19 00:30:22 Added 1085/82688.3/0.859457 Rejected 213+0/16835.5/0.852453 BMark 3762/253021.4/0.844105 to 4847/335709.7/0.859457
2006-Mar-19 07:31:13 Added 35/2128.6/0.830401 BMark 4847/335709.7/0.859457 to 4882/337838.3/0.859457
2006-Mar-21 11:50:09 Added 3014/235556.6/0.867159 Rejected 250+0/19911.4/0.860129 BMark 4882/337838.3/0.859457 to 7896/573394.9/0.867159
2006-Mar-21 23:19:05 Added 435/32121.2/0.863231 Rejected 89+0/6550.2/0.850004 BMark 7896/573394.9/0.867159 to 8331/605516.1/0.867159
2006-Mar-22 09:29:24 Added 29/2644.8/0.860722 BMark 8331/605516.1/0.867159 to 8360/608160.9/0.867159
2006-Mar-23 08:05:20 Added 200/14241.0/0.866559 Rejected 85+0/6172.0/0.858691 BMark 8360/608160.9/0.867159 to 8560/622401.9/0.867159
2006-Mar-23 20:32:23 Added 72/4618.1/0.862447 BMark 8560/622401.9/0.867159 to 8632/627020.0/0.867159
2006-Mar-25 17:07:32 Added 215/15344.3/0.868820 Rejected 44+0/3190.8/0.860997 BMark 8632/627020.0/0.867159 to 8847/642364.3/0.868820
2006-Mar-25 18:23:16 Added 54/4622.0/0.863796 Rejected 11+0/878.8/0.838113 BMark 8847/642364.3/0.868820 to 8901/646986.3/0.868820
2006-Mar-25 19:26:46 Added 30/2636.4/0.860489 BMark 8901/646986.3/0.868820 to 8931/649622.7/0.868820
2006-Mar-25 22:28:17 Added 34/2446.5/0.867417 BMark 8931/649622.7/0.868820 to 8965/652069.2/0.868820
2006-Mar-25 23:24:39 Added 40/3205.3/0.863759 Rejected 19+0/1536.6/0.860489 BMark 8965/652069.2/0.868820 to 9005/655274.5/0.868820
2006-Mar-27 01:23:51 Added 230/18429.6/0.869178 Rejected 87+0/6712.1/0.867855 BMark 9005/655274.5/0.868820 to 9235/673704.1/0.869178
2006-Mar-27 02:37:59 Added 145/10669.3/0.867855 Rejected 86+0/6744.8/0.867855 BMark 9235/673704.1/0.869178 to 9380/684373.4/0.869178
2006-Mar-28 02:33:27 Added 40/3036.8/0.865887 BMark 9380/684373.4/0.869178 to 9420/687410.2/0.869178
2006-Mar-28 03:19:56 Added -153/-13308.4/0.869178 Rejected 403+0/30287.0/0.867855 BMark 9420/687410.2/0.869178 to 9267/674101.8/0.869178

Lots of results rejected there, even back to before a recent code rearrangement I did, so I doubt it's that.  It says a lot of your rejected results are repeats of ones that you've already sent (as opposed to uploaded samplefiles).  That could occur if you tried to send multiple times or maybe if it sent partially to one FTP server and then tried another.
Fozzie
2006-03-29 10:57:08
1.9 million supposedly uploaded and -6k awarded.

This is beginning to take the proverbial p155
Stephen Brooks
2006-03-30 12:17:47
On the 28th/29th I had some bugs in a build of the stats generator, which I've hopefully fixed now.  So re-sending the latest few results out of results.dat should put them back more successfully now.
Merlin
2006-03-30 16:11:02
Yes I have noticed it trying 4 or 5 times on just 3 of my systems.  I thought it was strange.  everything would say they were transfered and go threw the whole upload and then the final delete 6 files, but then it would connect to another ftp server and do it again.......

I will take them 3 systems down and reinstall it, masybe something goofie there.......

But that will have to wait, I am in Florida right now and my systems are back in Wisconsin.
Should be home this Sat or sunday.......
Fozzie
2006-03-31 03:47:26
Stephen I didn't quite understand your last post are you saying you will correct the problem or suggesting I go round all 20 or so boxen and ddo something to get that credit back?
Stephen Brooks
2006-03-31 10:25:35
I'm not totally sure - I've certainly fixed a problem or two, but what it was doing before then it's hard to say.  I restored a load of stuff from backups, but it won't have backed up gradual losses, only sudden ones.

To be sure, getting the last 1MB off results.dat for each of your machines and re-sending it would make sure nothing was lost.  (Don't send the whole file if it's *really* large though...)
traveller
2006-04-02 09:20:46
Recently I was uploading results from one of my machines using manualsend.bat, and FTP data connection stalled (but FTP control conection did not).  After that, the file was deleted; results were listed in sendlog.log but not in the stats.  So I re-uploaded entire results.dat from that machine and now, according to stats server, I have 45 more results than I expected hrugs:
Stephen Brooks
2006-04-03 03:37:39
That's becoming common with the Windows FTP now, very unreliable.  I'm working on a better way of sending results for the next version.

You can change the FTP command to another client if you know one that will take scripts though.
: contact : - - -
E-mail: sbstrudel characterstephenbrooks.orgTwitter: stephenjbrooksMastodon: strudel charactersjbstrudel charactermstdn.io

Site has had 16983030 accesses.