stephenbrooks.org : Results sent in not reflected

[Ars]kenlow 2002-08-24 08:11:13	Hi Stephen, Just a quick question. I send in results at 0200, 0800 and 1400 UTC. And I usually see the stats reflect the results submitted within the next update. But todays 0800 submission have not been reflected at all. I am sure that results were submitted as I checked the FTP log before closing it. Did you get the results at all? I have scheduled about 10 machines to upload their results at this time. My total particles have remained at 279337655 since the 0200 upload. Thanks. Ken
[Ars]kenlow 2002-08-24 09:38:18	I've just sent in results from my home machine and it was reflected by the next update. The results sent in on August 24 0800 UTC was not reflected though. That upload consists of 6 hours work from about 10 machines. Thanx.
Stephen Brooks 2002-08-24 09:41:41	I've checked through your results file here and there appears to be nothing wrong with it, so I don't know where your results might have got to...
[Ars]kenlow 2002-08-24 20:09:21	quote: Originally posted by Stephen Brooks: I've checked through your results file here and there appears to be nothing wrong with it, so I don't know where your results might have got to... This time the August 25th 0200 UTC results are not reflected. I am not sure about my office machines, but I am sure that my home machines uploaded the results successfully. But the 0304 UTC update does not reflect it at all.
AySz88 2002-08-25 20:15:13	Sorry about hijacking the thread, but ties for muon percentage isn't working: Name/Handle Results Total particles simulated Best muon transfer Results last updated 2002-Aug-26, 03:05 UTC Build 4.00 Build 4.0x Build 4.1 Build 4.2 101. Namanao[www.rechenkraft.net] - - 29 981 39`727`816 (.233%) 1.690% (36th) 102. Jonathan Kitterman - - 1`660 108 38`447`048 (.226%) 0.182% (192nd) 103. FoBoT[Free-DC.org] - - - 952 37`301`959 (.219%) 1.358% (80th) 104. AySz88 - 367 381 353 36`776`799 (.216%) 1.690% (35th) See #101 and #104 (me).

gogomaus
2002-08-26 02:48:47

@ AySz88,
I assume this a rounding effect. Results are calculated with 6 decimals in %-yield, but within stats only the first 3 decimal digits are presented. Thus f.e. 1.690234% is better than 1.690123%....

AySz88
2002-08-26 02:52:28

Ah, right. Forgot. Okay.

Pascal
2002-08-26 03:01:48

Interesting thing. Some weeks ago I saw two participants with an equal yield percentage, and they were both in the same ranking,

e.g. both 35th, the next was then 37th

___________________________
Member of www.rechenkraft.net - German Website about Distributed Computing Projects

1: Athlon TB-C, 1.2 GC/s, 256 MB DDR-RAM, Erazor xÂ², ADSL-Flatrate, NIC Intel, Win 98 SE Mainboard MSI-6380 Rev. 1
2: Pentium III, 600 MC/s, 256 MB RAM, NIC Intel, Win 98 SE

Bluumi [SwissTeam.NET]
2002-08-26 04:11:34

quote:
I saw two participants with an equal yield percentage, and they were both in the same ranking

Than it is EXACTLY the same (percent)

some ago three or four had 1.679% ... and all other places ...

And some time 2 results may exactly the same percents ... but NOT the same parameters ... why not