 |
| Stephen Brooks 2008-08-19 14:17:27 | Roughly as I expected, Linac88MHz900MeV1 has been exceeded in yield by Linac900Removable1, so the older lattice has been removed to allow more CPU power for the new one. The difference between these ones is I enlarged the range of possible lengths of some sections, where the old lattice was pushing up against a limit. |
| [TA]Assimilator1 2008-08-23 17:31:54 | Thanks for the info  . |
| Stephen Brooks 2008-09-03 12:39:00 | The other two are now well past Linac88MHz900MeV6, so I'm removing that too. |
