![]() |
Stephen Brooks 2003-11-27 06:46:11 | This morning I gave a talk as the ISIS Accelerator Division fortnightly meeting. You can download the .ppt file of it from http://stephenbrooks.org/ral/report/ . There are some links that won't work in that presentation: the "View animation" one just shows a timelapse of a Muon1 simulation. The "137-variable" one starts viewresults.exe (so I could show them that) and the "internet-based" one displayed a snapshot of the Muon1 page on this site. HB Pencils, also sold as "Moron's Choice" Graphite Cigars. |
[AVE] MrSledgeHammer 2003-11-28 10:36:55 | Stephen,quote: nice to have such kind of feedback ![]() Regards Sledge ![]() ![]() ![]() |
BOHICASETI 2003-11-28 22:37:47 | ![]() ![]() ![]() Friends help friends move.... REAL friends help friends move dead bodies. |
Stephen Brooks 2003-12-04 02:21:40 | That talk looks very sketchy as just a .ppt file because I decided to have the slides just as a prompt (and to show some figures) and I talked for about 3 minutes on each one, which was the real explanation. But sometimes it's good to have summary slides available anyway. Since that talk took 35 minutes (plus there were 10 minutes of questions), if I do one for a conference it'll probably be shorter and more directly off the slides, so might be more readable. HB Pencils, also sold as "Moron's Choice" Graphite Cigars. |
[OCAU] badger 2003-12-04 15:48:55 | well it seems that you like all us scientists have "powerpointitis" stuffing far too much onto each slide! Although yours are much more readable than the usual ones I see around here... Good work tho, I was interested by slide two, where you seem to suggest that the tantalum rods could be replaced by other pion emitters. I am guessing that these would not emit pions in the same way, would this make a difference to the solenoid channel and bending chicane optimum design? Or are these fairly insensitive to the pion input? www.BadgerMotorsport.tk Proudly sponsored by GRX-Computers |
Stephen Brooks 2003-12-05 03:18:55 | quote:That was a question I was asked at the accelerator group meeting, and is something that could well be the subject of a future optimisation, because I haven't found out yet (need to get a target physicist to find me another dataset). Note that the "ferris wheel" of rods wouldn't be any different to the distribution used now, but other things like the liquid mercury target certainly could be. Another thing that will change the distribution is the energy of the incident proton beam, which is more likely to be 8GeV than 2.2GeV in the RAL setup. HB Pencils, also sold as "Moron's Choice" Graphite Cigars. |